Hearing no objection here or on the PR, this change has been merged. Authors, 
please submit a new version of the document at your earliest convenience. 

Best,
Chris

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Christopher Wood wrote:
> A PR with the proposed change is here:
> 
>    https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/77
> 
> Please have a look and let the list know if you object to the change. 
> Absent objection, we'll merge it and move the document forward.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 9:27 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > ekr proposed a fix to address the lone remaining AD review issue: 
> > tweaking the MAC (AtE) input; see the later messages in [0]. During the 
> > session there was consensus to tweak the proposal to be more like what 
> > Ben proposed in email, with the CID length before the CID and the 
> > on-the-wire header contiguous in the MAC input. Achim noted and ekr 
> > agreed in the thread after the session that what was presented needed 
> > to be tweaked. However, it appears that the general way forward, i.e., 
> > tweak the MAC (AtE), still holds. If you disagree with this please join 
> > the discussion in the thread referenced earlier. Once ekr has proposed 
> > a PR, we will run a quick consensus check to make sure we can move this 
> > I-D along.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Chris, Joe, and Sean
> > 
> > [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/fuIKh0KLOBDxEHO14OloItd87o8/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to