Hiya,
I'd like it were this version to be aiming to be for interop. But it refers to hpke-06 when hpke-07 was published ~90 minutess before this. So, if we do want interop for this, I guess it'd be best to push out -10 before the holidays with a ref to hpke-07? Or to just declare that the interop target is esni-09 with hpke-07? Or, are we not aiming for interop still? S. On 16/12/2020 16:02, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF.
Title : TLS Encrypted Client Hello
Authors : Eric Rescorla
Kazuho Oku
Nick Sullivan
Christopher A. Wood
Filename : draft-ietf-tls-esni-09.txt
Pages : 40
Date : 2020-12-16
Abstract:
This document describes a mechanism in Transport Layer Security (TLS)
for encrypting a ClientHello message under a server public key.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-esni/
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni-09.html
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tls-esni-09
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
