Looking at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09
§2:
- §2 ¶5 has «TLS 1.3, specified in TLSv1.3 [RFC8446]…».
- §2 ¶4 has «TLSv1.2, specified in RFC5246 [RFC5246]…»
- §2 ¶3 has «TLS 1.1, specified in [RFC4346]…»
Were these variant ( specified in plaintext+[link], specified in
link+[link], specified in [link] ) citation forms deliberate?
TLS 1.2 was given a "v" for version; the others not.
§2 ¶1 cites RFC 7457 twice with hyperlinks.
The document references in square brackets link directly to the
documents; elsewhere in the document, many square-bracketed
document references are intra-document links to §10, though RFC
references seem mostly to be direct (i.e., not intra-document).
Perhaps all square-bracketed links should be intra-document links
to §10? RFC 7322
seems adopt the same seemingly arbitrary (some links are direct;
some intra-document) hyperlinking without any related etiquette
guidance.
Regards,
Gary_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
