On Tue, Nov 10, 2020, at 22:05, Stephen Farrell wrote: > I'd be more in the "not yet" bracket for this. As Martin > mentions this'd seem to create a possibly attractive way > to do more tracking, so I think we ought try understand > how that might fit into the wider set of new things (e.g. > the HTTPS RRtype) before adopting.
I said something different. A subtle distinction perhaps, but an important one. I said that tracking protections could render this inoperative/ineffective. You seem to be saying something else, which is that you don't trust people to deploy this responsibly. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
