I think that the first sentence could be improved.

'The MD5 and SHA-1 hashing algorithms are steadily weakening ...' sounds as if they are under attack from electrolytic corrosion or the death-watch beatle.

I suggest
NEW
'The MD5 and SHA-1 hashing algorithms are increasingly vulnerable to attack and this document deprecates their use in TLS 1.2 digital signatures.'

And

/This draft/This document/

Tom Petch

On 14/10/2020 19:40, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG (tls) to
consider the following document: - 'Deprecating MD5 and SHA-1 signature
hashes in TLS 1.2'
   <draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-c...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-10-28. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


    The MD5 and SHA-1 hashing algorithms are steadily weakening in
    strength and their deprecation process should begin for their use in
    TLS 1.2 digital signatures.  However, this document does not
    deprecate SHA-1 in HMAC for record protection.  This document updates
    RFC 5246 and RFC 7525.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.





_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
ietf-annou...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
.


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to