> Hopefully https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446#section-4.2.11.2 > makes it clear why the pre_shared_key extension must be at > the end of the list.
I see what was done, but it still makes me a bit sad that whatever security property was desired couldn't have been done differently to avoid this requirement. Hopefully we never discover a new extension that should be "last" .... Mike _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
