Mike,

I suggest you make sure you understand the analyses (plural) that have been 
done.  You are very far in the minority here. Even some folks who say "we don't 
need these features," but nobody else has said "this is not secure."

This is not to say that the RFC could not be improved, and gain clarity.  There 
is a 1.3 update RFC likely to be adopted by the WG soon, and if you find things 
unclear in 8446, opening issues could help.
 

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to