Mike, I suggest you make sure you understand the analyses (plural) that have been done. You are very far in the minority here. Even some folks who say "we don't need these features," but nobody else has said "this is not secure."
This is not to say that the RFC could not be improved, and gain clarity. There is a 1.3 update RFC likely to be adopted by the WG soon, and if you find things unclear in 8446, opening issues could help. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls