On 7/29/20 at 5:20 AM, furr...@gmail.com (Jen Linkova) wrote:
So issuing the WGLC in the trough between IETF meetings caused an
undesirable outcome of people not paying enough attention.
But thanks for the comments, I'll take it into account - let's
consider it my learning curve..
As a long-time lurker on the TLS list, I don't think these
comments apply to the TLS working group. I see the ongoing
business of draft, comment, new draft etc. going on
continuously, only to be interrupted with email about IETF
scheduling and agendas.
I would suggest that anything requiring input from the TLS
working group be presented between IETF meetings, when there are
many TLS experts who will take the time to review and comment.
Cheers - Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | "I wish there was a knob on the TV to turn
up the
408-348-7900 | intelligence. There's a knob called
"brightness", but
www.pwpconsult.com | it doesn't work. -- Gallagher
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
