Thanks you Rich. Obviously I support the adoption as one of the authors. But more importantly, the reality of growing TLS proxy was the driver for starting the draft. That has been a sidecar with the progression of TLS and its wide deployment. We felt the lack of a baseline bcp is going to hurt the security posture of TLS rather than driving the intermediary away.
Best, -Eric On Jul 27, 2020, at 5:37 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Not adopting this seems to be ignoring reality. There are places which use TLS intermediaries. Are those users not welcome here? I support adoption. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list op...@ietf.org<mailto:op...@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
