Okay let’s call this done! ECH it is. spt
Sent from my iPhone >> On May 21, 2020, at 11:53, Erik Nygren <erik+i...@nygren.org> wrote: > > Are there any objections to "ECH" or should we just go with that? > (I'd like to update the parameter name in SRVB/HTTPSSVC accordingly based on > what gets decided.) > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:37 PM Tommy Pauly <tpa...@apple.com> wrote: >> ECH is good. Go for it! >> >> Tommy >> >>>> On May 20, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Erik Nygren <erik+i...@nygren.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> ECH works for me. (I really don't care between ECH and ETCH and thing both >>> are fine.) >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:20 PM Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020, at 8:18 PM, Filippo Valsorda wrote: >>>> > As a data point, I was fairly confused when ECHO came up in >>>> > conversation, and had to stop to ask what it was. I think I would have >>>> > had a better chance of figuring it out from context or search if it >>>> > were called ECH, but don't have a strong preference for any specific >>>> > name. >>>> > >>>> > ECH does have a remarkable short Wikipedia disambiguation list, FWIW. >>>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECH >>>> >>>> ECH also works for me. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Chris (no hat) >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> TLS mailing list >>>> TLS@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TLS mailing list >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
