Hi Jonathan,

A (delayed) thank you for this helpful review. Your input will be
incorporated into draft -08.

Nick

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 6:31 PM Jonathan Hammell <jfhamme.c...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The draft looks good.  I have a few minor nits and suggestions.
>
> Section 3, Fourth bullet: s/TLS hadshake/TLS handshake
>
> Section 3, Fourth bullet: To eliminate possible confusion, what is
> meant by "certificate’s working key" could be defined more precisely.
>
> Section 3.2, Last paragraph: s/Automated Certificate Managmeent
> Encvironment/Automated Certificate Management Environment
>
> Section 3.2, Last paragraph: "It is possible to address the
> short-lived certificate concerns above ..." seems to refer to text in
> the Introduction.  It is a bit far for use of "above" rather than
> indicating the particular section.  Even better would be to add some
> text regarding the concerns to Section 3 or 3.1.
>
> Section 4: The definition of "valid_time" could mention that the value
> must not exceed 7 days.
>
> Section 4: The phrase
> "Minimizing their semantics in this way is intended to mitigate the
> risk of cross protocol attacks involving delegated credentials."
> could be improved by adding at least one way that the minimized
> semantics mitigate such attacks.
>
> Section 6.1: The term "TLS private key" is used for the first time
> here. In the rest of the document we see the term "delegated private
> key"; are these the same?
>
> Section 6.1: The following phrase describes an important condition for
> using delegated credentials:
> "Thus, delegated credentials should not be used to send a delegation
> to an untrusted party, but is meant to be used between parties that
> have some trust relationship with each other."
> I think it is important enough to include a similar statement when
> describing the solution in Section 3.
>
> Section 6.4: s/cache the certificate chain an re-validate it/cache the
> certificate chain and re-validate it
>
>
> Best regards,
> Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to