[Trimming extensively] On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:05 PM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> Reuse may never be specified, and worst case there'll be two ways to say > "give me at most one ticket on resumption", with "at most 1" meaning > "1" in that version of reality. The two ways being sending either "0" > or "1" for the resumption count (assuming the new session count in > both cases is != 0). > > If there are serious objections to interpreting a zero resumption count > as 1 because that may later prove useful, I've not heard them yet. Well, both MT and Nick have raised objections, and they seem serious to me: TLS has decided, as memorialized both in the charter and in 8446, that ticket reuse ought not to be encouraged, and therefore we should not specify technical features at Recommended that are designed to facilitate that. I appreciate that you don't consider this a "serious" objection, but that's your opinion, and in this matter, consensus is a judgement for the chairs and ADs to make, not you. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
