I'm jumping in late - so apologies in advance for potential ignorant comments:
On 2/12/20, 3:48 PM, "TLS on behalf of Martin Thomson" <tls-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > Larger public keys and/or ciphertexts - if we need these, we're in serious > trouble. > To give you an idea, even at 1k, these will start being much harder to deploy. > Getting close to 64k adds all sorts of complication. You saw the key sizes that the NIST PQC candidates require? How would you suggest dealing with them unless there's support for larger public keys?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
