On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:41 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> My guess is that all of the above will lead to everyone > always using 260 for this value, making it pointless > and somewhat wasteful. > Whether it's wasteful depends on how big typical ClientHello (without early data) messages are. If they'll easily fit in one packet, 260 doesn't matter. This seems like something TLS WG should track, tbh. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
