On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, at 17:13, Nick Sullivan wrote: > One may note that no matter what the choice is with respect to RSA, > this particular wrinkle also applies more broadly. For example, if a > client advertises support for ed25519 in "signature_algorithms" in > order to support ed25519 delegated credentials, it should also be > prepared to receive an ed25519 certificate.
Good point. But I'm not sure that I'm happy with that property. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
