On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:18 PM Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> wrote:
> I struggle a bit to understand how this thread is related to the SNI > Encryption Requirements document. Rob, you raise the question of using and > possibly hiding the SNI when using TLS to protect communication between > servers. That's a fine debate, but I don't see how this specific usage of > TLS and SNI affects the draft or change the requirements on SNI encryption > mechanics. We also have an interesting process issue, because this draft > already went through WG last call, IETF last call, and IESG review. At this > stage, it would take a huge issue to stop the presses and rework the > document. > Hello, I didn't realize the document was at that phase. Also, my suggestion can be added at any time. So, I don't think this discussion should hold up any progression in the IETF process. Sorry for any confusion. I support moving this document forward. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
