On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:28:36AM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote: > Which value do they want? As we have previously established in relation to > the discussion on connection IDs and handshake types, there are values that > would be sent in the clear in (D)TLS 1.3, which have very tight constraints, > and those that would be sent under encryption, which might not need so close > scrutiny.
This one would be sent encrypted -- the contents need to be encrypted, which impacted which mechanisms were viable for them. > I get the impression that there are constraints here. This will likely be > multiplexed in an RFC 7983 sense in DTLS 1.2, so the range of values here is > narrow. But not as narrow as to require access to the prime space between 20 > and 31 that we are using for handshake types that need to be sent in the > clear. I think that we should encourage the use of a value >= 32 in this case. I don't think the specific value to allocate has come up yet; I'll try to remember to keep an eye out once IANA gets to that point. Thanks! -Ben _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
