Hiya, On 30/07/2019 00:58, David Benjamin wrote: > > [*] I filed https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/177 last > week with a sketch of an idea. Steven or I should hopefully have a more > concrete PR later.
Working from there seems like a good path. That said I don't see that that says how an ESNI-aware but not ESNI-configured server ought behave. And it seems a bit complicated, although I agree a 50:50 split is as or more arbitrary. S. PS: I'll note that I didn't know that PR existed as it hadn't hit the mailing list and I rarely login to the github web UI and that this isn't the first time I've had that experience. I don't blame anyone but there's clearly a bit of process stuff not quite working well here. I think people raising non-editorial PRs should bring those to the list.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
