Hi Erik, On 08/07/2019 22:27, Erik Nygren wrote: > > In particular for the TLS WG, we'd be interested in hearing if this would > solve enough of the ESNI-key-delivery-via-DNS needs for the HTTPS use-case.
I'm not clear if you envisage this entirely replacing the new ESNI RR (as defined in ESNI draft-03), or if you envisage both being defined, with this one (HTTPSSVC) being used for the web and the ESNI RR for non-web uses of TLS, or maybe something else? It'd seem like a bad plan two have multiple ways of doing the same thing, but I guess there're trade-offs in various directions here. BTW - I read an earlier version of your draft and there were a few detailed discrepancies vs. the ESNI draft but those could be resolved later. Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
