+1
(I am not sure this is the best way to handle external PSK long term, but it
seems like good way to address this issue for the moment without making changes
to TLS 1.3)
-----Original Message-----
From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Melinda Shore
<melinda.sh...@nomountain.net>
Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2019 at 07:45
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, at 10:57, Sean Turner wrote:
> At TLS@IETF104, there was consensus in the room to adopt
> draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer. This message is to confirm that
> consensus. If you do not support adoption of
> draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer as WG item please say so by
> 2359UTC on 22 April 2019 (and say why).
I support adoption.
Melinda
--
Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@nomountain.net
Software longa, hardware brevis
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
