On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:09:16PM -0400, Victor Vasiliev wrote: > This sounds reasonable to me. I currently don't have a plan for > implementing this, but since zstd is well-defined and has an RFC published > (that I can easily cite), I see no reason not to add it. > > I wrote up a PR: https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression/pull/26. > I will merge it before the last call, unless there are objections.
This seems pretty inoffensive (just one more allocated codepoint), and it's already been a few days and nobody seems to object. We'd like to submit a new draft version so we can finally go to WGLC, so if nobody objects by tomorrow I'll just merge the PR and upload the draft. Cheers _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
