On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:39:49PM +0100, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Wednesday, 13 February 2019 15:39:03 CET Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > To my knowledge, there was never a WG discussion about this exact question, > > so we only have the spec to guide us. Were we pre-publication I would have > > advocated for (a) leaving open whether to abort and (b) requiring you to > > use the second value. > > so you don't think this qualifies for Errata?
Errata are used for things that were errors at the time of publication (and, presumably, had WG consensus for being errors). Since there was apparently no WG consensus on this specific topic at time of publication, the errata process seems inappropriate. -Ben _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
