Given the low amount of responses, we’re going to extend this adoption call for another two weeks. As a reminder, if you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves through the process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC 20180222. If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why).
Thanks, Chris, Joe, and Sean On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:58 AM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > I'd like to hear from some people who plan to implement and deploy this. > Absent that, I'm not sure we should adopt it. Code points are free, so it > doesn't need to be a TLS WG item unless the TLS WG and community are going to > do substantial work on it. > > -Ekr > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:12 AM Christopher Wood > <christopherwoo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> At the TLS@IETF103 session, there was interest in adopting >> draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as an experimental WG >> item, provided that it's limited to external PSKs with certificates >> for the initial handshake. This email is to determine whether there is >> WG consensus to adopt this draft (as is) as a WG item. >> >> If you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are >> willing to review it as it moves through the process, then please let >> the list know by 2359UTC 20180208. If you are opposed to this being a >> WG document, please say so (and say why). >> >> Thanks, >> Chris, Joe and Sean >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
