On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 07:01:57AM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Once we start talking about pinning of any sort, we move from this > extension just being "transport some DNS records" into conveying some > sort of additional semantics.
The I-D lost consensus over one issue. We should resolve that issue. There are some minor other things (like the fact that TLSA RR names include a port number and the TLS server needs to know, or that we shouldn't specify an RR sort order, or that the age of the chain payload needs to be included), but they are minor by comparison. Whether we discuss those first or the main event is not that interesting to me, but if we're going to make progress I think we should have time for the main event. Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
