On Sunday, 2 September 2018 19:18:19 CEST Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 04:12:31PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: > > > We submitted an Internet Draft defining the usage of the Brainpool > > > Curves for TLS 1.3. > > > > I believe it's not desirable to have a maximally large number of > > algorithms specified for TLS. To the contrary, I believe it'd be good > > to keep things as simple as possible and limit choices if there's no > > good reason for them. > > Agreed.
I'm against adding those curves to cryptographic libraries for the already stated reasons. That being said, people asking for code point registrations shouldn't be forbidden from getting them – we may consider the reasons why they want them to be misguided or wrong – but we won't promote interoperability between implementations by forcing people to squat code points. -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
