SHOULD NOT would probably be fine. MUST NOT is too strong, and probably needs revisiting.
Regards, Uri Sent from my iPhone On Jul 19, 2018, at 06:32, Johannes Merkle <johannes.mer...@secunet.com> wrote: >>> Code points for pre-1.3 were assigned, and they are invalid for TLS 1.3. >>> Those “you should not send these for 1.3” could be re-used for TLS 1.3, if >>> that was desired. >> >> Yes this makes sense. And I think that they should, documented as something >> other than “Recommended”. >> > > I still don't get it. If the existing code points are re-used, the TLS 1.3 > standard is violated. > > Johannes > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
