On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:51:46PM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 7/4/18 6:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I thought the authors wanted this done quickly, but lately they
> > seem to be in no rush to get the document finished.
>
> I'm still trying to figure out a way forward that's useful
> for the people who intend to use this extension and that doesn't
> add cruft or ambiguity. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to
> be one, so compromise is necessary.
Since the updated security considerations and new denial of existence
text are not looking controversial, it would be helpful to all
parties to get a new revision out with those merged so they can be
polished and put behind us. That leaves just the reserved field
unresolved.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
