On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 09:45:36 CEST Peter Gutmann wrote: > Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> writes: > >As of the latest version, things should be the same - extensions shouldn't > >affect whether connections work. > > Sure, the only reason for mentioning the "last version with extensions" is > that apparently some of the systems require browser extensions, and they > aren't going to be rewritten for current versions of Firefox. So it was > whatever the last version with extensions was, either 52ESR or 56 (I didn't > ask, I'm on FF 56).
what "browser extensions"? you can't really do a modern TLS 1.2 without extensions, let alone TLS 1.3 (which is now enabled by default in NSS). I'm quite sure NSS didn't drop any consequential ones... -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
