> There's a tradeoff between respecting the official allocation processes
and avoiding real-world breakage. I think we can all make our own
assessments
on the former, but for the latter, all the evidence we have so far is a
claim
from Peter that there exists software that hardcodes this number, with no
indication of scale of deployment or ease of updating such software.
Peter tried very hard to play by all the rules, whether they were enshrined in
formal documents, or "just" decisions by WG chairs, and everything in-between.
Peter says the number is in use.
I believe him.
Give him the damn number.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
