> On May 16, 2018, at 12:08 AM, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@nomountain.net>
> wrote:
>
> At any rate this is starting to feel like abuse of process.
I was simply following a security AD's suggestion from today's earlier
thread with the AD's authors and chairs:
> Therefore, if you want to make that change, you need to persuade the WG.
I still think that the WG has not had a chance to fully consider the
specific issue of reserving the two bytes as part of the present
remediation to remove the unwanted (by anyone of us) unilateral
client-side pinning. The proposal is conservative, and does not
contradict the consensus to remove pinning for now. It just leaves
the door open going forward, at negligible cost (two bytes on the
wire in bandwidth, and zero in implementation).
Therefore, based on the above advice, I am giving the WG the benefit
of the doubt.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
