To clarify, I asked for exact text to understand better what is being asked
for, since it wasn't very clear to me what the scope fo the change is.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@nomountain.net
> wrote:

> On 4/25/18 7:33 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Perhaps a concrete proposal will make it
> > easier to reach a mutually-agreeable consensus position, and make it
> > clear that the requested 16-bits are a reasonable consensus outcome.
>
> Hi, Viktor:
>
> This doesn't actually reflect the consensus called by the
> chairs, as I understand what was posted.  It may be useful
> to start work on a new draft describing your proposal.
>
> Melinda
>
>
> --
> Software longa, hardware brevis
>
> PGP key fingerprint  4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
>                      34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to