> On Apr 4, 2018, at 17:05, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > >> >> Abstract: >> >> Please include the list of updated RFCs in the abstract. See >> <https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/checklist/> §3.1.D. The current >> formulation >> of "This document updates many (D)TLS RFCs (see updates header)" is >> problematic >> due to the factors described in the final paragraph of RFC 7322 §4.3. > > See Ben’s response.
Here we are again. This time I updated the abstract to include the 8 RFCs this draft “updates”.* spt * I still think this policy is silly. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
