On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote: >>> A server MUST NOT enforce this restriction; a client might advertise a >>> higher limit that is enabled by an extension or version the server does not >>> understand. > > It would, if it were present. The IESG is reviewing version -02 of the > document, in which that text does not appear. (I see it's in your repo, so > presumably the -03 version will address the issue I highlight).
My fault. Sean prompted me to push out a new version, then IESG reviews started coming in, so I held back. That was the result of a secdir review. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
