We (Firefox/NSS) intend to not use 0304 until the RFC is published. Of course, it might be safe for Wireshark to start earlier as its compat story is different.
-Ekr On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote: > On 03/29/2018 09:30 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > With draft-ietf-tls13-28 being approved by the IESG, can implementations > > already start using the TLS 1.3 version number (0x304) rather than the > > draft version indicators? Or should they wait until publication of the > > final RFC? > > You/we should wait until the publication of the final RFC. > > -Ben > > > If it can already be used, then I'll ensure that Wireshark 2.6 will have > > support for TLS 1.3 (0x304) and close > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12779 > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
