On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:29:09PM +0000, John Mattsson wrote:
> I don’t think it is required either, the mechanisms in 
> draft-schmertmann-dice-codtls and draft-friel-tls-over-http clearly wotks, 
> but Hannes Tschofenig brought it up as a new mechanism that can be used to 
> simplify things in ATLS, I tend to agree. I don’t think we should invent new 
> mechanism for ATLS if we can use Connection ID.

My personal opinion is that it will be easier for ATLS to use DLS
natively than to produce a reliable in-order stream abstraction for
TLS's use.  (I say, as someone who is not going to be doing the
work, so take that for what it is.)

-Ben

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to