> On Mar 20, 2018, at 12:52, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Monday, 19 March 2018 23:53:16 CET Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Hubert Kario wrote: >>> On Sunday, 18 March 2018 16:27:34 CET Eric Rescorla wrote: >>>> After discussion with the chairs and the AD, I have opted to just add a >>>> section >>>> that explains the attack. I just merged that (but managed not to get it >>>> into -27 >>>> due to fumble fingering). >>> >>> If there is no consensus on the recommended fix for the issue, I wonder if >>> we shouldn't then soften the language in the section about PSK binder >>> handling, from SHOULD to MAY. >> >> I think on the balance I am happier retaining SHOULD. >> >>> Though, I'd say that the reference to that newly added section is >>> definitely missing. >> >> I expect that can be done as an RFC Editor note or during AUTH48. >> >> -Benjamin > > https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1189 filed as a reminder
Thanks! spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls