> On Mar 20, 2018, at 12:52, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Monday, 19 March 2018 23:53:16 CET Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Hubert Kario wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 18 March 2018 16:27:34 CET Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>>> After discussion with the chairs and the AD, I have opted to just add a
>>>> section
>>>> that explains the attack. I just merged that (but managed not to get it
>>>> into -27
>>>> due to fumble fingering).
>>> 
>>> If there is no consensus on the recommended fix for the issue, I wonder if
>>> we shouldn't then soften the language in the section about PSK binder
>>> handling, from SHOULD to MAY.
>> 
>> I think on the balance I am happier retaining SHOULD.
>> 
>>> Though, I'd say that the reference to that newly added section is
>>> definitely missing.
>> 
>> I expect that can be done as an RFC Editor note or during AUTH48.
>> 
>> -Benjamin
> 
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1189 filed as a reminder

Thanks!

spt
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to