Are we going to discuss draft-fenter ad hoc, or we'll start a new thread dedicated to that? Because I strongly believe I also have some suggestions for that draft.
ср, 14 мар. 2018 г., 23:30 Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>: > Some on this list have said that they need to break into TLS in order to > protect customers. > > > > The thing customers seem to need the most protection is having their > personal data stolen. It seems to happen with amazing and disappointing > regularity on astounding scales. Some examples include > > - retailer Target, presumably subject to PCI-DSS rules > - Anthem health insurance, presumably a regulated industry > - Equifax, a financial-business organization (but apparently not > regulated) > - Yahoo, a company created on and by and for the Internet (one would > think they know better) > > We could, of course, go on and on and on. > > > > NONE of those organizations are using TLS 1.3. > > > > So what kind of “protect the customer” requires breaking TLS? And what > benefits and increased protection will customers see? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
