Clarifying question

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> Ted:
>
> I do not follow.
>
> This is a bogus argument.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure there's a Monty Python skit about this, so I won't belabor
> the point.
>
>
> I'll avoid asking how many sparrows are needed ;-)
>
> First, staying with an old protocol version often leads to locking in
> unmaintained versions of old software.
>
>
> Right, that's one of the stated goals of this work: to be able to continue
> to use software that the operator can't upgrade.
>
>
> No, the enterprise wants to use maintained server implementations.
>
> Second, using TLS1.2 does not technically address the issue.  If the client
> were to exclusively offer DHE-based ciphersuites, then the visibility
> techniques that have been used in the past are thwarted.
>
>
> The client in this case is under the control of the operator, so this is a
> non-issue.
>
>
> In some cases, the client in the load balancer is under the control of the
> enterprise.  In other cases, the client is in the customer browser, and
> opt-in is very significant.

When you say customer browser, do you mean the users on the enterprise
network behind the firewall, all within the control of the enterprise
that owns the data?  I think this is what is meant since the Internet
sessions from customers could be terminated at a load balancer on the
enterprise edge and then this extension may be used between servers
internal to the enterprise and from what you are saying, browsers as
well.  Or is the plan for this to be opt-in from the customer external
to the enterprise (I didn't think that was the case and it would be
good to clarify).  This distinction would be helpful to know where
traffic may be intercepted if there were another party that might be
malicious.

Thanks,
Kathleen

>
> Russ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to