On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Alan DeKok <al...@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:39 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Out of the secdir review (thanks again Alan!), I realized that the > > draft never actually said this: > > > > PMTU governs the size of UDP datagrams, which limits the size of > records, but > > does not prevent records from being smaller. An endpoint that sends > small > > records is still able to send multiple records in a single UDP > datagram. > > > > I think that I should add that explanation. > > > > Does anyone think that this should go further and advise against > > putting multiple records in the same datagram? > > Yes. I don't think there's any good reason for that kind of behaviour. > There actually are. One example is packing handshake and data records in the same datagram. -Ekr > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
