On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Kathleen Moriarty > <kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What's the behavior when the middlebox is a proxy, let's say existing > > a managed network? I presume from from section 3.1 that this > > negotiation doesn't work in that instance unless sites configured for > > this are not subject to the proxy as is often done for financial site > > access from corporate networks. It would be good to know if it does > > work and that is addressed with the text Mirja calls out for her #1 > > question. Having this clarified could be helpful. > > If there is a MitM, then this extension simply isn't negotiated. > That's pretty well understood. I don't see why that requires special > mention. > Yeah, I agree Martin .. this is the same as with any other extension. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
