> -----Original Message----- > From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:18 AM > To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> > Cc: 'Martin Thomson' <martin.thom...@gmail.com>; tls@ietf.org; draft-ietf- > tls-record-li...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-record-limit > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:31:53AM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote: > > Martin, > > > > I think that the wording I would prefer would be along the lines of > > > > A server MUST NOT error on the value of the extension when a higher > > TLS version is requested. The server MUST use the minimum of the > > requested value and the maximum value for the TLS version negotiated. > > A server MAY error if a the value of the extension is exceeded for the > > version of TLS requested. > > You need to consider the case where there is some unknown-to-server > extension that happens to alter the limit.
I am not sure how, as a that server, I could possibly do that. I can't act on something I don't understand. Jim > > > -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
