But I agree, it would be good to have some more clarity around use cases
and why not other solutions.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:

> HTTP CONNECT is not great for some use cases because it requires the app
> to be aware that it's dealing with a proxy.  It's simpler if you can just
> have one code path that works whether your TLS is intermediated or not.
> With the solution outlined in the draft, you can just always ignore the
> certificate the server sends in the first TLS connection (because it might
> be from a MitM), and then do all your cert validation, pin checks, etc. at
> the application layer.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Why not use HTTP CONNECT?  Or rather, it would be helpful to have a
>> section on when/why one would do this vs. CONNECT.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey TLS folks,
>>>
>>> Owen, Max, and I have been kicking around some ideas for how to make
>>> secure connections in environments where HTTPS is subject to MitM /
>>> proxying.
>>>
>>> The below draft lays out a way to tunnel TLS over HTTPS, in hopes of
>>> creating a channel you could use when you really need things to be private,
>>> even from the local MitM.
>>>
>>> Feedback obviously very welcome.  Interested in whether folks think this
>>> is a useful area in which to develop an RFC, and any thoughts on how to do
>>> this better.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:47 PM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-friel-tls-over-http-00.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Owen Friel and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>>
>>>> Name:           draft-friel-tls-over-http
>>>> Revision:       00
>>>> Title:          Application-Layer TLS
>>>> Document date:  2017-10-30
>>>> Group:          Individual Submission
>>>> Pages:          20
>>>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-
>>>> drafts/draft-friel-tls-over-http-00.txt
>>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/
>>>> doc/draft-friel-tls-over-http/
>>>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/d
>>>> raft-friel-tls-over-http-00
>>>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/
>>>> doc/html/draft-friel-tls-over-http-00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>    Many clients need to establish secure connections to application
>>>>    services but face challenges establishing these connections due to
>>>>    the presence of middleboxes that terminate TLS connections from the
>>>>    client and restablish new TLS connections to the service.  This
>>>>    document defines a mechanism for transporting TLS records in HTTP
>>>>    message bodies between clients and services.  This enables clients
>>>>    and services to establish secure connections using TLS at the
>>>>    application layer, and treat any middleboxes that are intercepting
>>>>    traffic at the network layer as untrusted transport.  In short, this
>>>>    mechanism moves the TLS handshake up the OSI stack to the application
>>>>    layer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>> submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TLS mailing list
>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to