On 10/23/2017 07:12 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Another comment is about symmetrical CID. > > 1. Consider a client sends a normal CID (CID length is not > zero, named C-CID) to server, but the server doesn’t wants to use > client’s CID and sends a CID generated by the server (named S-CID) > to the client. > > No. The CID is for the client's benefit, so why would this be useful? > > > At the same time, client needs to know server has ignored C-CID > (which means the downlink application message from the server will > not include C-CID), and client will use S-CID in its application > message. Will the draft cover this scenario? > > No.
That is to say, this draft does not consider symmetrical CIDs at all. -Ben
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
