ekr proposed a PR (#47) for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates that clarified the specification required rules to include Internet Drafts.
I believe this is not the intent and we should close the issue. I think the intent of specification required is to allow a community that needs a code point to make a specification available in a public location that is relevant to that community. I don't think an an I-D would be appropriate in most cases. Cheers, Joe
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
