On 19/10/17 15:16, Paul Turner wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell >> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 09:07 >> To: Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com>; tls@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00 >> >> >> Hiya, >> >> On 18/10/17 18:41, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>> P.S. I agree with Rich; can we try to defer these conversations until >>> after 1.3 is actually published? >> >> FWIW, I also think it'd be a good plan if the chairs did that. I'm happy to >> oppose these ideas any time, but later is better than now, given this would >> further distract us from 1.3. > > I don't think this is a good plan.
Why exactly? What here is so urgent that it needs to be haggled over before TLS1.3 is done? TLS1.3 is the major work item for which this WG is chartered, and breaking TLS is something that is outside this WG's charter entirely. I think you'd need a very good argument that any WG ought prioritise out-of-scope work at the expense of the main goal of the WG. S. > >> >> S. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
