On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > > >> I suggest we not have this debate now. We'll have a lot more data towards >> the end of the month and we can have an informed discussion then. >
> That is what I am asking for. More information so that the entire WG can > make an informed decision. And I was only laying out an option that does > not seem to have been considered before. The group (or the IETF) might also consider a policy to answer Ilari Liusvaara's question, "What you think is acceptable failure rate?" That is a governance issue. It should probably be [nearly] written in stone and applied equally to all problems and decisions. As an example, the US's IRS used to have a policy to support any browser with 3% market share or more. I don't know what it is nowadays. Jeff _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
