On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:29:55PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Ilari, > > Thanks for the by-extension categorization/breakdown.
Sigh, I missed cached_info, because that does not appear in TLS 1.3 extension lists. It falls into "unsafe to alter because unknown commitments" category. However, I identified a new category of extensions that I didn't notice before: Dependent on altered extensions. There are no such standardized extensions, but there is at least one proposal (in WG draft stage). The latter kind of extensions is incompatible with MUST be the same except <list of extensions> requirement. -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
