Respectfully disagree. Having two cryptographically independent PRNGs, one for 
public data and one for key material, IMHO is a good idea. Of course, both 
should be properly seeded - but that's a different issue.

Regards,
Uri

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 19:33, Dan Brown <danibr...@blackberry.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I don't think 2 CSPRNGs is a good idea.
> 
> Wasn’t there a few years back some RSA keys with separate p and q, generated 
> independently leading to an attack...
> 
> Here if the seeds to initialize the RNGS are related, or one is weak, or 
> worst if the seed is a raw source that doesn’t change in the moments between 
> the two CSPRNG inits, that'd be bad, even if the CSPRNGs were good.
> From: Eric Rescorla
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 6:34 PM
> To: Stephen Farrell
> Cc: tls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [TLS] 32 byte randoms in TLS1.3 hello's
> 
> Spec updated here;
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/commit/465de0e189b2b59090d0eac0acbc42942af9ca77
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I've suggested some text for this in a PR [1]
>> based on what people have said in this thread.
>> 
>> I'm sure that can be further improved.
>> 
>> It might be no harm to add more pointers to that
>> appendix from elsewhere in the spec, and/or to
>> add a list of the various public/private random
>> numbers that are needed to that appendix. (I'd be
>> happy to do a pass to identify those if folks
>> basically like this kind of addition.)
>> 
>> I also need to figure out how to handle the
>> reference properly:-) Can do that tomorrow.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> S.
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1068
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to