Except when it's the issue of mutual consent (rather than of a merely technical change).
Otherwise - "we have to change one side" might turn into "have you pay me $50,000 every month, your opt-in isn't necessary". :-) Regards, Uri Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 14, 2017, at 12:45, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 14 Jul 2017, at 18:35, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <j...@cdt.org> wrote: >> >> Just want to +1 the notion that this should be opt-in for both sides and in >> an extension! > > It’s a good notion, but “we have to change one side” usually wins over “we > have to change both sides” > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
