First, I do not see this as a “wiretapping discussion” based on my reading of 
2804, although others may disagree.

Second, I believe that this discussion should go forward based on several 
points:

  1.  this proposal does not involve any changes to the bits on the wire 
specified in the TLS 1.3 document
  2.  this proposal offers significantly better security properties than 
current practice (central distribution of static RSA keys)
  3.  alternative solutions with significantly worse security properties are 
also feasible under TLS 1.3, and I would like to avoid them!

We should be in the business of developing pragmatic, interoperable solutions 
with appropriate security properties.  Balancing cryptographic security with 
other security requirements to achieve such solutions should be an acceptable 
path, and pursuing this work in the TLS working group gives the IETF the best 
opportunity to influence these solutions.



_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to